Today, we are going to share the 5 biggest SEO myths and why they’re false.
The internet is littered with content advertising and the noise is almost deafening. This article lists and explains some of the biggest SEO myths out there.
1. Your Essay Should Have 500 Words.
The time for following a set of principles is over. A common SEO myth that is believed, there was a magical number of phrases that search engines looked for but this is not true. SEO and AI specialists explain across the web why this statement just doesn’t hold true.
2. The More Keyword Cites The Better.
The more keywords the better, in concept, seems like it would work to help you rank for a key phrase. However, search engines may discover congestion of keywords and dock you for it or even eliminate the articles. To gain traction in search results, your articles should be ‘information-rich and not keyword-rich’. Content Optimization makes suggestions for the number of times and where.
3. Metadata Is A Waste Of Time.
Another common one among SEO myths. Metadata isn’t a waste of time, we repeat not a waste of time! However, poorly written metadata is. Metadata optimization guides you to create the most effective descriptions that users would want to click.
4. Search-ability Is Only About Words.
Part of being effective at generating content that is optimized is knowing your audience and their intent. Many folks enjoy a picture right? Alt tags play a key role in optimizing images for SEO. You’re really missing out on a significant piece of the puzzle if you choose not to use Alt tags.
5. I’ll Never Have The Ability To Compete.
It’s definitely possible to compete if you understand the landscape. That is the essence of an article relevance score because once you’ve added the key phrase you would like to compete for, optimization tools would scan the web to provide personalized goals for optimizing your particular phrase. These aims are derived from the intel found on the highest-ranking articles using that key phrase for a particular region.